ECParts Toolkit LogoECParts Toolkit

Free-Space Path Loss Calculator

Calculate ideal free-space path loss from RF frequency and distance, solve the reverse distance or frequency, and compare two line-of-sight RF links under the same isotropic reference model.

This calculator only covers the propagation path-loss term. It does not include transmit power, antenna gain, cable loss, receiver sensitivity, link margin, terrain, penetration loss, rain fade, multipath or Fresnel-zone clearance.

Engineering tool

Free-Space Path Loss Calculator

Calculate ideal free-space path loss from frequency and distance, solve maximum distance or frequency, and compare two ideal RF links.

Result console

Free-Space Path Loss
80.052008 dB
Wavelength
12.491352 cm
Frequency Used
2.4 GHz
Distance Used
100 m
Linear Path-Loss Ratio
1.012047e+8Pt / Pr
Ideal Power Transfer Ratio
9.880961e-9Pr / Pt
Ideal Power Transfer
9.880961e-7%
Formula Used
FSPL = 20log10(4πdf / c)

Free-space path loss assumes ideal line-of-sight propagation and isotropic reference antennas. It does not include transmit power, antenna gain, cable loss, fading, terrain, buildings, rain or receiver sensitivity.

Free-space path loss spreading diagramA transmitter radiates outward through ideal free space. A receiver at a greater distance intercepts a smaller portion of the spherical wavefront.TxisotropicRxreferencedistance dFSPL describes ideal geometric spreading, not cable loss, mismatch loss, fade margin, or a full link budget.
Free-space path loss is the inverse-square geometric spreading term in the ideal Friis reference model.

Formula reference

Free-Space Path Loss Formulas

Internal calculations use SI units: hertz, meters, meters per second, dimensionless ratios and dB.

λ = c / fFSPL = 20 × log10(4πd / λ)FSPL = 20 × log10(4πdf / c)FSPL(dB) ≈ 32.44 + 20log10(dkm) + 20log10(fMHz)FSPL(dB) ≈ 92.45 + 20log10(dkm) + 20log10(fGHz)d = c / (4πf) × 10^(FSPL / 20)f = c / (4πd) × 10^(FSPL / 20)Llinear = 10^(FSPL / 10)Pr / Pt = 10^(-FSPL / 10)

Variable definitions

FSPL
ideal free-space path loss in dB
d
transmitter-to-receiver separation distance in meters
f
RF frequency in hertz
λ
wavelength in meters
c
speed of light, 299,792,458 m/s
Llinear
transmitted-to-received isotropic free-space power ratio
Pt
transmit power reference in the ideal Friis proportional term
Pr
receive power reference in the ideal Friis proportional term
π
mathematical constant pi
This calculator does not add antenna gain or system loss terms.

Worked Examples

100 MHz over 1 km

FSPL = 32.4478 + 20log10(1 km) + 20log10(100 MHz) = 72.4478 dB. Wavelength is 2.9979 m.

433 MHz over 1 km

Using the SI formula, FSPL = 85.1775 dB. Wavelength is 0.692361 m.

915 MHz over 1 km

Using the SI formula, FSPL = 91.6762 dB. Wavelength is 0.327642 m.

2.4 GHz over 100 m

FSPL = 80.0520 dB. Wavelength is 0.124914 m and the ideal power transfer ratio is about 9.881e-9.

2.4 GHz over 1 km

FSPL = 100.0520 dB. Increasing distance from 100 m to 1 km adds exactly 20 dB in the ideal model.

5.8 GHz over 1 km

FSPL = 107.7163 dB. Wavelength is 0.051688 m.

Maximum distance

At 2.4 GHz with 100 dB allowed FSPL, d = c / (4πf) × 10^(100/20), or about 994.03 m.

Calculate frequency

At 1 km with 100 dB FSPL, f = c / (4πd) × 10^(100/20), or about 2.386 GHz.

Compare distance increase

At 2.4 GHz, 200 m has 6.0206 dB more FSPL than 100 m. The linear loss ratio difference is 4.

Compare frequency increase

At the same distance, 2 GHz has 6.0206 dB more FSPL than 1 GHz under isotropic assumptions.

Engineering Notes

  • FSPL increases as distance increases. Doubling distance adds about 6.0206 dB, and increasing distance by 10 times adds 20 dB.
  • At the same distance and isotropic reference, doubling frequency adds about 6.0206 dB, and increasing frequency by 10 times adds 20 dB.
  • FSPL is not cable loss, antenna loss, mismatch loss, or air absorption. It describes geometric spreading of an electromagnetic wave.
  • Real wireless propagation may include multipath, shadowing, diffraction, ground reflection, building penetration, foliage loss, rain attenuation, atmospheric absorption and polarization mismatch.
  • Ideal free-space conditions usually do not fully represent indoor, urban, forest, low-altitude ground or non-line-of-sight links.
  • The model is usually applied in far-field conditions. Very short distances or large antennas may require a different near-field treatment.
  • Coverage range must be evaluated with transmit power, antenna gains, receiver sensitivity, fade margin, interference, regulations and antenna height.
  • When physical antenna aperture or gain changes with frequency, system-level comparisons can differ from a simple equal-gain FSPL comparison.

Common Mistakes

  • Putting meters into the MHz/km constant formula.
  • Using GHz where the formula expects MHz.
  • Confusing FSPL with coaxial cable attenuation.
  • Assuming FSPL means energy is absorbed by air.
  • Ignoring antenna gain and treating FSPL as a complete link budget.
  • Assuming ideal maximum distance equals real coverage distance.
  • Ignoring receiver sensitivity, fade margin, obstacles and multipath.
  • Thinking frequency doubling doubles loss instead of adding about 6.0206 dB.
  • Ignoring near-field limits at very short distances.
  • Multiplying linear loss ratios and dB values as if they were the same kind of quantity.

FSPL, Friis and Link Budget Boundary

Friis transmission equation is Pr = Pt × Gt × Gr × (λ / 4πd)². When Gt = 1 and Gr = 1, the ideal power ratio becomes Pr / Pt = (λ / 4πd)². The inverse is the free-space path-loss linear ratio, LFS = (4πd / λ)², and FSPL = 20log10(4πd / λ).

RF-004 calculates FSPL and ideal proportional terms only. RF-005 is reserved for a general link budget with transmit power, antenna gains, cable losses, path loss, receiver sensitivity and link margin. RF-012 is reserved for ideal Friis received-power calculation with transmit power and antenna gains.

Support reference

FAQ

What is free-space path loss?

Free-space path loss is the ideal geometric spreading loss between two points in unobstructed free space. It describes how power density decreases with distance and frequency in the isotropic Friis reference model.

How do I calculate FSPL?

Use FSPL = 20log10(4πdf / c), where distance is in meters, frequency is in hertz, and c is the speed of light. The common MHz/km form is approximately 32.44 + 20log10(dkm) + 20log10(fMHz).

Why does path loss increase with distance?

In free space, electromagnetic energy spreads over a larger spherical area as distance increases. Doubling distance increases FSPL by about 6.0206 dB, and increasing distance by 10 times adds 20 dB.

Why does path loss increase with frequency?

For the same distance and isotropic antenna reference, higher frequency means shorter wavelength and a smaller Friis power-transfer term. Doubling frequency increases FSPL by about 6.0206 dB.

What is the difference between FSPL and link budget?

FSPL is only the ideal propagation path-loss term. A link budget also includes transmit power, antenna gains, cable losses, receiver sensitivity, implementation losses and fade margin.

Does FSPL include antenna gain?

No. FSPL is calculated before antenna gain is added. Antenna gains are handled in a full link budget or Friis received-power calculation.

Does FSPL include cable loss?

No. Cable loss is a separate attenuation term caused by transmission-line loss. It is not the same as free-space path loss.

Can FSPL predict real wireless range?

Not by itself. Real range depends on transmit power, antenna gains, receiver sensitivity, fade margin, terrain, obstacles, interference, polarization, regulations and installation details.

What is the difference between FSPL and the Friis transmission equation?

FSPL is the loss term from the Friis equation. Friis received power also includes transmit power and antenna gains. RF-004 calculates FSPL only; RF-012 is reserved for ideal Friis received power.

Does free-space path loss mean energy is absorbed by the air?

No. FSPL primarily describes geometric spreading in ideal free space. Atmospheric absorption, rain fade and building penetration are separate effects.

When does the free-space model become inaccurate?

The model becomes less representative in near-field conditions, indoor or urban environments, obstructed links, multipath, diffraction, ground reflection, foliage, rain, atmospheric absorption or non-line-of-sight paths.

Related RF Calculators

Free-Space Path Loss Explained

In_Development

Friis Transmission Equation Explained

In_Development

How Distance and Frequency Affect RF Path Loss

In_Development

How to Build an RF Link Budget

In_Development

Near Field vs Far Field

In_Development

Understanding Wireless Fade Margin

In_Development

Disclaimer

This calculator provides ideal free-space propagation estimates only. It does not replace RF link-budget design, site survey, regulatory review, antenna measurement, receiver testing, safety analysis, or field validation.